Friday, June 24, 2005
Bringing In The Sheaves
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Read this. Get pissed off. (Part 2)
This adult picture brought to you by... censorship!
That's right folks, censorship is alive and well in the 21st century, and websites such as Gay.com (where the above image is from) are forced to "dumb down" their rules on pictures... pictures of members who have paid for this service.
As a paying member of Gay.com, this upsets me. So I am posting the information that they have posted on their site about why they have resorted to this measure. So read it, get pissed off, and do something. That's all I'm asking.
Changes to our photo policy mandated by the Bush Administration
Always on the lookout for hot guys and ways to keep people from having fun, the US Dept. of Justice is taking a break from prosecuting terrorists to do something they think is more important: restricting your right to view and share photos online.
All member photos identified as adult on our site are temporarily unavailable for public view, due to the sudden, and unconstitutional, decision by the US Dept. of Justice to place new restrictions on all web sites around the world that do business in the US (I guess nobody ever told them the internet is borderless). Gay.com thinks your adult photos should be sexy, secure, and legally protected, so we've joined with other companies to seek an injunction against this ruling. We're doing everything possible to minimize its impact on you.
What does this mean for you?
Your civil liberties are under attack by the US government!
All photos identified as adult will be temporarily unavailable from public view
Members will still be able to view their own adult photos and edit their profiles, but they temporarily won't be able to see anyone else's adult photos
Gay.com will begin reviewing all adult photos, and will make them available again for public viewing if they meet our new standards (see below)
About these new government regulations
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has previously found these regulations to be unconstitutional, yet the Bush Administration has chosen to pursue them anyway
The new regulations go into effect June 23, 2005
It only applies to "sexually explicit" content, not content that is merely "lascivious" (Hmmm, I don't know what explicit means, but I know it when I see it!)
See below for a detailed, and entertaining, explanation of what's "explicit."
Your adult photos
The good news: most of your photos are OK (including your adult photos) and will be restored once they've been approved by Gay.com, because the dirty boys at the US government only consider certain poses and activities to be "sexually explicit"
The bad news: under these regulations Gay.com will no longer be able to accept or display "sexually explicit" photos from its members for either public or private view
New standards for "sexually explicit" content on Gay.com
• A hand holding or touching genitals, or appearing to grip or stimulate genitals is considered masturbation and is prohibited.
• A hand clearly "cupping" or covering genitals for the purposes of keeping them covered is allowable.
• A hand inside pants is prohibited as it implies masturbation.
• Pictures with more that one person that include nudity are prohibited.
• All cartoons are prohibited.
• While images of a nude person on all fours is allowable, an image showing the buttocks being held apart by hands would be considered explicit and prohibited.
• In the interest of safety, no images of nude children (e.g. a nude baby at the beach with her two dads) will be allowed.
• A clothed person posing with their pet is allowed, but a nude person with an animal is prohibited (no more walking your dog in the nude!).
• An image of a person in a bondage or fetish outfit is allowed (but please, no polyester!).
• Images that depict bondage or S&M "abuse" are prohibited (shockingly, images from Abu Ghraib prison would be censored under the new regulations)
• Digital images run through an "illustrator" filter on software would be held to these same standards
What is Gay.com doing about the regulation?
• We have joined with other companies to legally challenge its enactment
• We're fighting for your civil liberties, and oppose undue government interference with individual expression
• We're fighting against such regulations because we know they have a disproportionate effect on historically isolated groups, such as the LGBT community
Make your voice heard!
Contact US elected officials and the Dept. of Justice to tell them you oppose 18 U.S.C. §2257
US Dept. of Justice: www.usdoj.gov/contact-us.html
US Senate: www.senate.gov
US House of Representatives: www.house.gov
Support the Electronic Frontier Foundation in its efforts to defend freedom in the digital world www.eff.org
Need help?
Call: 1 (866) 313-6373
(Toll-free in the US & Canada)
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Read this. Get pissed off.
Monday, June 20, 2005
Dearest Tom Cruise: Shut the F**k Up!
The Ride Home
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Fantasy Soon to be Reality! (?)
It's looking like my fantasy of a new home for my ramblings is taking steps closer to reality!
Thanks to Feisty Girl and Scott-O-Rama, and possibly a few others who may be recruited (I know who you are!), things are progressing! It may not look EXACTLY like what you see to the right... but it will hopefully look somewhat like it.
I've just about abandoned the WordPress idea though. I can't seem to find anyone that knows how to set up a template, and when I tried to do it myself, the results were disastrous to say the least. So I think we're just going to start all over again and see what comes up.
In the meantime, RcktRamblings is what it is, and will stay that way for a while.
And if you are handy with coding sites like this, and want to help out, do drop me a line and let me know. Your help would be most greatly appreciated!
Monday, June 13, 2005
Why I hate to answer the phone
Michael Jackson - Not Guilty
Friday, June 10, 2005
Flashbacks
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
It's not sweat... I'm GLOWING
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Lactivists
Nursing moms protest 'The View' comments NEW YORK, June 7 (UPI) -- About 150 "lactivists" nursed their babies outside ABC's New York City studios to protest comments made by the women of "The View." Barbara Walters had said she and a companion felt awkward sitting next to a nursing mother on an airplane, the New York Daily News said. "It made me very nervous," Walters said on the May 17 show. "She didn't cover the baby with a blanket. It made us uncomfortable." Co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck, who is nursing her daughter, Grace, said she was "uncomfortable breast-feeding in general." Then the hosts appeared to celebrate when Hasselbeck said her daughter had her first bottle of formula, sparking nurse-in protests in four cities, the Daily News said. Women protesting in New York Monday said they feared the comments may keep some mothers from nursing and some even demanded an on-air apology. Walters said she was surprised by all the fuss and said all the hosts of "The View" support breast-feeding.
Friday, June 03, 2005
I Have Been Changed For Good
I'm flying high, defying gravity tonight. That's right... I saw "Wicked" tonight. And I loved it. Every. Single. Moment.
So call me a dork, call me a musical junkie, call me a gayboy, call me whatever you want. I loved it and I am not ashamed to say it. Everyone's entitled to their opinions, right? Right.
I never got to see Wicked in New York... in fact, I have never seen a Broadway show ON Broadway. (It's time I change that, don't you think?)
But fortunately for me, Chicago has a pretty decent stream of Broadway-bound shows that premiere here, as well as well-known Broadway hits, such as "Wicked," that play either short or extended runs here.
We're really lucky with "Wicked," because after this current cast, which is a touring production based on the Broadway show, we are going to get our own, permanent cast (starring, interestingly enough, Ana Gasteyer from "Saturday Night Live" as Elphaba) that is going to say for an open run. Needless to say, the city is abuzz.
The current cast is not represented on the poster displayed here... that, of course, is the original Broadway cast that everyone knows. But this cast was really superb. Stephanie J. Block (Elphaba, the Wicked Witch of the West) was simply outstanding. She easily gives Idina Menzel a run for her money. And Kendra Kassebaum (Galinda/Glinda) was also fantastic, maybe not as vocally strong as Kristin Chenowith, but every ounce as perky and entertaining. Other strong performers were David Garrison as the Wizard, who you may remember playing Steve, Marcy's first husband on "Married, With Children;" Barbara Tirrell, who was the understudy for Carol Kane in the role of Madame Morrible, and Jenna Leigh Green as Nessarose.
My only disappointment was with Fiyero, played by Derrick Williams. He was a little cardboard in his presence, and at times I wasn't happy with his voice... but when he and Stephanie Block dueted on "As Long As You're Mine," it was pretty electric.
But the show belonged to the leads... and they were wonderful. There wasn't a dry eye in the house during "For Good," the final duet between them. And when Elphaba lept and flew above the stage during "Defying Gravity," the audience was stunned.
Stephen Schwartz, who wrote the music and lyrics to "Wicked" has long been one of my favorite composers. Ever since I sang "All Good Gifts" during a production of "Godspell" in my sophomore year of high school, I've been hooked. Hell, my cat's name is Pippin... you don't think I named him after the former Chicago Bulls star, do you? ;-)
Some say this isn't his best score, but I say it is. There are some downright gorgeous songs in this show. And one of them-- probably my favorite of all-- is "For Good." The words are as moving as the melody. And they fit so many different situations, and mean so many different things to so many people.
So I am sharing some of them with you. Because they express how I feel about many of you out there... and I just want to thank you for all you've done for me in the last year. (Can you believe it's almost been a year since I started this blog?)
Of course, these are copyright of Mr. Schwartz, so I must give credit to him here... so please visit his website at www.stephenschwartz.com.
For Good from "Wicked" I’ve heard it said That people come into our lives for a reason Bringing something we must learn And we are led To those who help us most to grow If we let them And we help them in return Well, I don’t know if I believe that’s true But I know I’m who I am today Because I knew you... Like a comet pulled from orbit As it passes a sun Like a stream that meets a boulder Halfway through the wood Who can say if I’ve been changed for the better? But because I knew you I have been changed for good … It well may be That we will never meet again In this lifetime So let me say before we part So much of me Is made of what I learned from you You’ll be with me Like a handprint on my heart And now whatever way our stories end I know you have re-written mine By being my friend... Like a ship blown from its mooring By a wind off the sea Like a seed dropped by a skybird In a distant wood Who can say if I’ve been changed for the better? But because I knew you... Because I knew you... I have been changed for good... And just to clear the air I ask forgiveness For the things I’ve done you blame me for But then, I guess we know There’s blame to share And none of it seems to matter anymore
For the full set of lyrics and other good stuff about "Wicked," visit this link: http://www.musicalschwartz.com/wicked-lyrics.htm

